翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Commonwealth v Verwayen
・ Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal
・ Commonwealth v. Alger
・ Commonwealth v. Brady
・ Commonwealth v. Donoghue
・ Commonwealth v. Hunt
・ Commonwealth v. Jennison
・ Commonwealth v. Kneeland
・ Commonwealth v. Malone
・ Commonwealth v. Matos
・ Commonwealth v. Morrow
・ Commonwealth v. O'Malley
・ Commonwealth v. Pullis
・ Commonwealth v. Sharpless
・ Commonwealth v. Twitchell
Commonwealth v. Wasson
・ Commonwealth v. Watkins
・ Commonwealth Veteran Fencing Championships
・ Commonwealth War Graves Commission
・ Commonwealth Water Polo Championships
・ Commonwealth Winter Games
・ Commonwealth Wrestling Championship
・ Commonwealth Writers
・ Commonwealth XI cricket team
・ Commonwealth XI cricket team in India and Ceylon in 1950–51
・ Commonwealth XI cricket team in India in 1953–54
・ Commonwealth XI cricket team in India in 1964–65
・ Commonwealth XI cricket team in India, Pakistan and Ceylon in 1949–50
・ Commonwealth XI cricket team in South Africa in 1959–60
・ Commonwealth Youth Games


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Commonwealth v. Wasson : ウィキペディア英語版
Commonwealth v. Wasson

''Kentucky v. Wasson'' (842 S.W.2d 487) was a 1992 Kentucky Supreme Court decision striking down that state's criminalization of consensual sodomy between same-sex partners, holding that this was a violation of both the equal protection of the laws and the right to privacy. The Kentucky case helped pave the way for many other states and eventually the United States Supreme Court to issue similar rulings.
==The law at issue==
At that time, Kentucky law criminalized consensual sexual relations between people of the same sex, even if conducted in private. Specifically, the law criminalized genital-oral (oral sex), genital-anal (anal sex), and anal-oral (rimming) sex -but only between partners of the same sex. Such sexual activities between mixed-sex (male-female) couples were legal. Such conduct was a misdemeanor punishable by up to 12 months in jail and a fine of up to $500. Solicitation of same was also a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 90 days in jail and a fine of up to $250.
Historically, Kentucky's sodomy statutes had changed over time. The 1860 sodomy statute criminalized anal penetration by a penis and applied to both male-female couples and male-male couples. Because the law focused exclusively on penile-anal penetration, consensual sex between women was technically legal in Kentucky until 1974. In fact, in 1909 the Kentucky Supreme Court issued a ruling in Commonwealth v. Poindexter involving two African-American men arrested for consensual oral sex. In this decision the court upheld that the then current sodomy law did not criminalize oral sex but only anal sex.
In 1974 Kentucky revised its statutes as part of a penal code reform advocated by the American Law Institute. While the American Law Institute urged states to decriminalize consensual sodomy and other victimless crimes, the Kentucky legislature chose to decriminalize anal sex involving male-female couples but to broaden the new statute to criminalize anal-genital, oral-genital, and oral-anal sexual contact involving same-sex couples (both male-male and female-female couples). Thus, the 1974 revised statute decriminalized consensual anal sex for mixed-sex couples but expanded criminalization of sexual acts to include both male and female same-sex couples.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Commonwealth v. Wasson」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.